1.0 release is coming soon! 🚀 Learn more →

QA.tech vs Playwright

Explore how QA.tech stands out in the QA testing landscape as we compare our features directly with those of Playwright

An in depth comparision

Why QA.tech is the better alternative to Playwright

Comprehensive Test Discovery for QA Automation

Our platform, QA.tech, simplifies the process of identifying what needs to be tested in your web application. By thoroughly scanning your app’s functionality and user interactions, we automatically generate a detailed and relevant test suite designed to cover all critical scenarios.

Automated Test Case Creation

QA.tech takes the burden of manual test writing off your shoulders. Our platform automatically creates test cases based on the findings of the scan. These tests are written in easy-to-understand, natural language, making it simple for engineering, product, and QA teams to collaborate seamlessly on quality assurance efforts.

Advanced Bug Detection with AI-Driven Learning

Unlike traditional solutions like Cypress, which only tests predefined scenarios, QA.tech continuously evaluates your application in real time. Our AI-driven technology adapts and learns with every test cycle, increasing the probability of discovering new bugs over time.

Comprehensive Test Session Documentation

Every test session on QA.tech is thoroughly documented. We capture screenshots, network logs, console logs, and more, ensuring that reproducing bugs is as efficient as possible. With everything collected in one place, resolving issues becomes faster and more straightforward.

Browser-Based Testing for Realistic Results

All of our tests run on Chrome browsers to ensure real-world accuracy in your testing process. This gives you confidence that the results reflect true user experiences.

Seamless CI/CD Integration

QA.tech integrates effortlessly into your existing CI/CD pipelines, including popular platforms like GitHub Actions, CircleCI, and Jenkins. With minimal setup, our solution enhances your development workflow, ensuring that quality checks are continuous and automated.

The old way vs the new way

Writing and setting up traditional scripted tests can take 8-12 hours. QA.tech automates the process, runs tests in minutes and easily scales without adding extra headcount.
Features
QA.Tech
Playwright
Discovery of test
ph-question
Automatic
Resilient to Changes
ph-check
Non-functional issues
ph-check
% of bugs identified
90%
Only pass/fail - no bug detection
Handles changes
ph-check
Integrates to your CI/CD
ph-check
ph-check
Bug reports in your ticket system
ph-check
ph-check
Supports any web framework
ph-check
ph-check
Time to create a test case
5 Mins
1 Hour
Time to run test suite
5 Min
20 h
1. Our study on AI vs Human QA (September 17, 2024).
View our plans

Case Study

Learn from our customers success
We have replaced over 320h of manual testing every month with QA.tech.

Fredrik Seidl – CTO

Upsales is a SaaS platform for CRM, marketing automation & Sales in B2B. ~150 employees.

Loved by developers

ph-arrow-left
ph-arrow-right
Since QA.tech flips the entire QA process on it's head, a lot has changed. We no longer require nearly as much manual QA-testing as we did before, which in turn allow us to test more of our app
Marcus Engvall
Marcus Engvall
Developer
Airpelago
This needs to be written
Some Body
Some Body
Developer
Company
Looking for LLM-based QA since GPT-3.5, because at Luden.io as a 15 devs studio we're obsessed with automated testing. Surprisingly, this is the very first model that figured out how to test our video games by using WASD movement and performing in-game actions.
Oleg Chumakov
Oleg Chumakov
The fact that QA.tech acts more like a human and reasons about the UI offers more relevant feedback than having a robot instantly press a button that you told it to press.
Maximilian Schön
Maximilian Schön
Looking for LLM-based QA since GPT-3.5, because at Luden.io as a 15 devs studio we're obsessed with automated testing. Surprisingly, this is the very first model that figured out how to test our video games by using WASD movement and performing in-game actions.
Oleg Chumakov
Oleg Chumakov
Traditionally end-2-end tests require a relatively big amount of manual maintenance, while QA.tech's tests evolve automatically as the product is developed.´
Jacob Klapwijk
Jacob Klapwijk
Developer
StartupTools
Getting started with QA.tech's tests is currently very easy, both to initiate a test suite and to integrate it with an existing CD/CI environment.
Johan Lindholm
Johan Lindholm
The fact that QA.tech acts more like a human and reasons about the UI offers more relevant feedback than having a robot instantly press a button that you told it to press.
Maximilian Schön
Maximilian Schön
Ready to deploy faster?

Save weeks of QA work every quarter., and get back to coding. Start with QA.tech today.